Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Ego
- Persona
- Shadow
- Animus and the Anima
- Self
- Transformation of the God-Image
- Is Christianity Doomed?
- An Antidote to the Apocalypse
- Jung’s Warning
Introduction
Now, I’d like to say a bit about what it means as one progresses in the process of self-knowledge, what it means to learn about each of those items that go to make up the structure of the psyche that I spoke of earlier.
Ego
Let’s start with the Ego. That’s the starting point for everything. One of the goals of the life process, just the natural life process, as well as the analytic process, is maximum Ego development. One can have no real analysis, one can have no real confrontation with the unconscious until one has a sturdy, responsible, and ethical Ego prepared to have that encounter. Before that, there’s no question of depth analysis. All that is available is a supportive psychotherapy that promotes Ego development. You see, it’s vitally important, just considering the social aspect of the matter, that members of society have good, strong, reliable Egos. That means they have to have an authentic sense of their own identity. They have to have acquired a responsible character structure that enables them to function responsibly in relation to other people. That’s all the product of Ego development. Just to start with, good Ego development is good not only for the individual, it’s good for the society that the individual is a part of.
Persona
Then the question of the Persona. What value is awareness of the Persona to the individual and society? Here again, as with all self-knowledge, both the individual and society benefit. You see, it commonly happens that to a greater or lesser extent, an individual is identified with this Persona. It’s so convenient. It’s hard enough to acquire competence in a professional career. Once that has been achieved, the satisfactions of that achievement are often so significant that there’s a strong tendency for the individual then to identify with the professional Persona that one learns in the course of his professional training. The minister learns his Persona as he goes through theological seminary and then starts his first job as a assistant pastor. The medical student learns the medical Persona. The lawyer learns his and so on. Once that’s learned, it makes things work so smoothly to operate out of it that there’s a strong tendency to identify with it. The trouble is for society as a whole that when one meets one’s doctor or one’s pastor or one’s lawyer or whatever, one isn’t meeting a full human being. You meet the mask and I’ll speak for my own profession. I won’t be little any other profession that I don’t know, but I can tell you that it’s a real problem in the medical profession. Doctors are very busy and it takes too much time to be real. It’s much easier to function out of your medical Persona and the great advantage of it, the temporary advantage is it’s like skating on a pond of frozen ice. It doesn’t take any effort. You don’t have to respond out of deeper human realities and you can get a lot more work done in the day. You can see more patients. If you take time to listen to them and respond to them humanly, you get caught up and you get way behind in your schedule. That’s all understandable, but if self-knowledge is to proceed and if individuals are going to achieve full, well-rounded human potentiality, it’s important for them to discover the reality of Persona and the fact that it’s not identical with the Ego and that if they choose to identify with it now and now and then, they are diminishing themselves both psychologically and humanly. Once those things become known, then the initial identification is broken and even though one may have to operate out of that Persona at times, then you know what you’re doing and it makes a world of difference whether you’re doing it consciously or unconsciously because choice is involved.
Shadow
Then turning to the next item being the Shadow. What’s the social advantage of being aware of the Shadow? I can tell you it’s immense because as long as one is unconscious of the Shadow, almost infallibly it gets projected. It gets projected onto somebody that provides some hook, some quality, maybe only in small degree, that corresponds to the nature of one’s own Shadow. Then when that happens, the projector has the delightful experience of locating evil. It’s out there in you and now I know what to attack in order to make the world a better place. In lesser Shadow projections, I guess no great harm is done. It’s an abrasion in the general mechanics of ordinary human relationships, but once it starts operating on a large collective scale, Shadow projection can be disastrous. I hardly need to spell out the examples of it because they’re everywhere to be seen where you’ve got one faction opposing another faction and attributing dark, evil, if not diabolical implications on the enemy faction. We see this everywhere in the world and I’m not going to go into the details, but this is all the consequence of Shadow projection and it’s really a disgrace for an educated and supposedly relatively mature human being to be caught engaging in a crude Shadow projection in this day and age, but disgrace or not, it happens all the time. It’s a grave damage to our social fabric. To the extent that an individual, through the analytic process, becomes aware of his Shadow, he is then inoculated from Shadow projection because he recognizes that the particular quality or idea or mode of living that is so annoying to him in the other person is an expression of his own Shadow which accounts for the annoyance. We can have likes or dislikes, but when a certain level of affect enters the picture, that’s an infallible indication of a Shadow projection and people unconscious of their Shadows are a grave danger to the welfare of society as a whole.
Animus and the Anima
Now, turning to the Animus and the Anima, we’re reaching a deeper layer now and here the social aspects cannot be spelled out in such simple terms. They’re present, but they’re more complex and occult and a little harder to express, but certainly we can say that an individual who has even a rudimentary awareness of the Animus is going to have a more authentic, a more conscious, a more fruitful and realistic relationship to the opposite sex. After all, that relationship between the sexes is quite fundamental to this whole social process. The family is based on it and the raising of children and the welfare of the psychological early development of children that is very dependent on the level of conscious relationship that exists between the parents and that type of understanding relationship that can endure the inevitable conflict between the opposites of the sexes is very much promoted and helped by an awareness of the Animus and Anima because with that awareness then one avoids the crudest of projections and can relate to the partner in terms of their reality rather than in terms of the illusory expectations one has when one has projected the Anima or Animus onto the partner.
Self
Now, coming finally to the question of the Self, the awareness of the Self. The Self is the center and totality of the psyche. One of its synonyms is the inner god image. It’s the transpersonal authority of the psyche. The Ego is the smaller authority and the Self is the larger authority. When one has made a contact with the Self, the Ego then becomes relativized and recognizes that its life must be governed by an authority higher than itself. Now, what does such a recognition have to do with society? A great deal indeed. In a certain sense, we can say that society is the exteriorized mirror of the psyche. Every society has a leader of some sort. At one stage it was the king or the president. Occasionally it’s an oligarchy of aristocrats, but always in order for society to be cohesive and exist organically, it has to have a central authority. That central external social authority is a mirror of the inner authority of the Self. That’s why when one has dreams of a king or of a president or of Washington, D.C., in most cases those dreams refer to the Self. What’s at issue here is the individual’s relation to authority. If one has no connection to the Self, and particularly when the Ego is weak, when there’s low level of psychological differentiation, especially in times of turmoil, social turmoil and distress, there is a strong tendency for the Self, the center, central organizing authority, principle of the psyche, to be projected. Because in times of turmoil, the compensatory aspect of the psyche activates, and turmoil then tends to constellate order. Disorder constellates order, and order in such circumstances often has to be imposed with some level of discipline and authoritarianism. What can happen in such cases then is that one gets massive collective projections of the Self onto the leader, the Fuhrer, for instance. That’s what happened in Nazi Germany. I’m looking for an adequate word to describe. It’s a lesson of instruction, of a magnitude that could hardly be exaggerated as to the dangers of the projection, the collective projection of the Self. That’s what happened in Nazi Germany. We see it happening in all sorts of charismatic religious cults. It’s happening in small scale, all over scattered, all around, and as we lose our containment in our conventional religious myth, this danger is going to become more and more operative, and it’s probably the greatest threat to humanity, much greater than the nuclear bomb.
Transformation of the God-Image
Jung puts it all very succinctly in answer to Job when he says God needs man, and encounter with man, has an effect on him. Now, that’s a symbolic statement. In psychological terms, the Self needs the Ego and the Ego’s awareness in relation to it in order to be transformed. That puts it in our neutral psychological language. The Self or the God image in its unconscious form, as I’ve said before, is a paradoxical union of opposites. This is the ground of our psychological being. The Christian God of love is only one half of it. That’s why Satan has never disappeared. He leads his separate existence, but he’s still around. Jung has demonstrated that Christ and Satan are the two opposite sons of the same paradoxical deity. When these images come into the range of empirical experience, they require some reconciliation. You see, they generate an inner conflict that’s intolerable until it achieves a reconciliation. This is what happens when the individual encounters the primordial God image in its paradoxical oppositeness. It experiences the activation of the conflict within the nature of the Godhead. Since also contained within the whole dynamic is the potential for a union and a reconciliation of those opposites, that can often be achieved in the individuation process by the process of active imagination. The net result then is that the psyche is no longer split. The Christian psyche is split, and that means everybody, whether you’re a professing Christian or not, it’s irrelevant. It’s part of the collective psychology we all share. We’re all split because the God image is split, and the split occurred even before Christianity. It was split by Plato and the Stoics, so it’s got a philosophical source too. That split, that paradoxical doubleness of deity, is what undergoes reconciliation and transformation when an individual human consciousness engages this depth issue. In its own individual life, then that little piece of the collective psyche that is carried by the individual has been transformed. If there are enough individuals who have had this experience and who have participated in this transformation of the God image, then they act as a kind of leaven to society as a whole, and very gradually a new collective God image is born out of that society as a whole.
Is Christianity Doomed?
You know, the question often comes up in modern thinking, is Christianity doomed? Has it run out? Jung makes a very interesting point in that regard. He points out that the Christian myth itself contains as part of its thematic structure, the death of God. I want to see if I can spell this out because I think it’s of some importance. According to the Christian myth, and I elaborate all this in my book, The Christian Archetype, according to the Christian myth, God, remember that in psychological terms whenever I use the phrase God, I’m referring to the psychological God image. Psychology does not presume to know anything about the metaphysical deity. We’re talking about the psychological God image, which is within the range of empirical experience. But according to the Christian myth, God descends to earth by incarnating himself as a man through the agency of the Holy Spirit, who impregnates the Virgin Mary. And God as man then lives a human life on the earth, incarnated. He goes through the passion, he dies, and he’s resurrected and then ascends to heaven. So that in his incarnated form, the myth describes the deity as passing through a death. What then happens after his death, according to the Christian myth, is that the Holy Spirit descends again on Pentecost. And this time, according to the church dogma, the church is born. Pentecost is considered to be the birthday of the church, so that the incarnation cycle repeats itself. The Holy Ghost, the deity descends and is incarnated a second time in the church, which describes itself as the body of Christ. Then, according to certain theologians, this is stated explicitly. The church as the body of Christ is obliged to live out the same faithful sequence as did Christ. That means the church must also go through a passion and a death. Now, the church projects that anticipation onto the last days as far off as possible. But considering this psychologically, we might consider that that’s happening right now. But the church is the body of Christ, the collective incarnation of Christ, so to speak, Christ was the first individual incarnation. The church was the second collective incarnation, who must also go through the passion and death and resurrection. And now, according to my understanding, the resurrection will then initiate a third cycle in which the Holy Spirit will be now incarnating itself in empirical individual human beings. That’s Jung’s point. And as you can see, as I spell it out that way, that’s a consistent and quite appropriate continuation and reinterpretation of the Christian myth. Jung was very concerned that the treasures, the treasure of the Christian myth, not be lost to modern man. And what he’s done is he’s provided a transformative and reinterpretive understanding of it in his notion of continuing incarnation, which preserves all of the rich Christian symbolism, you see, but now understood on a psychological individual level. And this is my understanding of what the new epoch means and why Jung is an epochal man.
An Antidote to the Apocalypse
So, we are in for some very grave disturbances in the collective social fabric of Western society. And Jung was keenly aware of that. And he even made the remarkable statement in a letter that he wrote Answer to Job because he did not want his moral laxity to allow things to drift towards the impending catastrophe. And what he revealed there, and is expressed very clearly, is that his book, Answer to Job, is the antidote to the apocalypse. If one can understand Answer to Job, one will be in a position to survive psychologically the onslaught of the apocalypse of the transition from one epoch to another, because he describes the psychological meaning of this collective event. And what it means without summarizing the book, which is impossible in this setting, what it means is that a process is going on in which the God image is undergoing transformation. And the process of that transformation requires human awareness of the divine nature in order for that nature to change. That puts it in a nutshell. In fact, I’ll repeat it. The essence of Answer to Job, which is the antidote allowing one to survive psychologically the apocalypse, is the realization that the apocalypse is a process in the transformation of God in which by means of entering human consciousness, the divine nature can undergo a transformation and change its nature. It’s all spelled out in the book of Job. I also discussed this matter in my little book on Blake’s engravings for the book of Job called The Encounter with the Self. You see, part of the divine nature… – Remember, I’m speaking psychologically, not metaphysically. Psychologists know nothing about metaphysics. Depth psychologists are good Kantians who recognize that metaphysical statements are beyond human possibility and so that they make no metaphysical assumptions at all. We’re talking about the psychological God image, that that God image is a union of opposites. It’s not only Christ, it’s also Satan. It’s not only Yahweh of the Book of Job, it’s also Behemoth and Leviathan. And that paradoxical God image with that dual nature is in the process of being transformed through being experienced by human consciousness. Being seen by human consciousness is the agent of its transformation. One individual at a time. It’s not done collectively. It’s not done in committee. It’s done one lonely individual at a time who has the experience of the divine ambiguity. And in the process of that experience penetrates that paradoxical Self with human consciousness which transforms it. This is the process I see now in its initial phases and which will continue with more and more intensity in the collective. You see, if we have more experiences of the same nature as the Nazi Holocaust, those are psychological events. Those are expressions of the collective human psyche. They weren’t natural disasters. They didn’t fall out of heaven. They were psychological events. So they are phenomena describing the nature of the collective psyche. And that’s the kind of stuff that we’re in store for as we go through this catastrophic transformation from one age to the next in which the divine image is undergoing transformation.
Jung’s Warning
“The world hangs on a thin thread and that is the psyche of man. Nowadays we are not threatened by elementary catastrophes. There’s no such thing as an h-bomb. That is all man’s doing. We are the great danger. The psyche is the great danger. What if something goes wrong with the psyche?”
